“This is not going to be the same neighborhood as we move on. Everyone is going to do something different and the zoning is going to change and allow you to do more appropriate as what we are showing now.”
There were no public comments on the development.
Hein, while noting the application was submitted under the 8-30g statute, made a motion that the applicant return to ARC one more time to respond to suggestions made during the meeting.
The entire committee voted in favor of the applicant returning again. The vote was 6-0, with Paul Pugliese recused.
Mr. Hein said the building would set a new precedent.
“We all know that this will begin to change the character of the neighborhood on a massive scale. That’s why the return (for another appearance before ARC) would have been beneficial. This will create a prototype and the committee could add value to the prototype. We all know the market forces at play here.”
