Submitted by John Budkins, Greenwich
Hearst Media’s recent report on the financial landscape of Connecticut’s 36th District Senate race highlights a critical issue: the overwhelming influx of out-of-state money into Nick Simmons’s campaign. The data reveals a stark reality—Simmons’s war chest is stuffed with contributions from far beyond our state borders, while his opponent, Ryan Fazio, relies almost exclusively on the people of Greenwich, Stamford, and New Canaan. This difference isn’t just about money; it’s about principles and priorities.
Ryan Fazio’s commitment to Connecticut is evident in every aspect of his campaign. He participates in the Citizens’ Election Program, which is designed to prioritize small-dollar donations from local residents over large, outside contributions. By accepting these limitations, Fazio has aligned himself with the needs and voices of his constituents rather than wealthy donors from Washington or San Francisco.
Simmons’s approach raises questions about his motivations and the influence his national network might wield should he take office. His fundraising numbers are impressive, but they tell a story of a candidate whose support is not rooted in the community he hopes to represent. Contributors from places like New York and California may share Simmons’s political vision, but they do not live with the daily challenges facing the people of the 36th District.
Fazio, on the other hand, stands on the strength of his record and the trust he has earned from those who know him best. His fundraising, modest compared to his opponent’s, reflects a campaign run by and for the people of Connecticut. Fazio’s supporters are neighbors, small business owners, and local families who believe in his pragmatic, locally-focused policies.
It is telling that Fazio chooses to raise his funds under the scrutiny and restrictions of public financing while Simmons declines to do so. The implications of this decision speak volumes about who these candidates are and where their priorities lie. As voters, we should remember that a campaign funded by out-of-state interests often serves out-of-state agendas. In November, let’s choose a candidate who puts Connecticut first.